The trial of the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, resumed on Tuesday at the Federal High Court in Abuja, with courtroom tensions, legal wrangling, and appeals dominating commencement of the day’s proceedings.

Kanu, who is facing terrorism-related charges, appeared in court amid a mild drama over legal representation and allegations of misconduct by a courtroom observer.

GALAXY TV reports that at the commencement of proceedings, the presiding judge drew attention to a letter from one Charles Ude, claiming to be counsel on record for the defendant.

However, the legal team of Defendant denied knowledge of Ude, a stance Kanu himself affirmed, insisting Agabi remained his counsel.

The court also addressed the issue of the overcrowded defence team.

According to the judge, only 16 of the 26 lawyers listed would be allowed, citing a previous agreement and threatening to move the proceedings online if decorum was not maintained.

A separate incident involved a woman named Favour Kanu, who was accused of recording court proceedings during a previous sitting and allegedly publishing restricted content online. The judge recounted how he had previously warned her and refrained from citing her for contempt.

Kanu, in an emotional plea, appealed to the judge for forgiveness on her behalf, quoting the Bible.

Favour, when called upon, claimed ignorance of the court still being in session and stated that she had stopped recording immediately after the warning.

The judge, while listening to both explanations, temporarily excused Favour from attending the next three sittings, reiterating the need for order and respect for the court’s process.